|
|
Registros recuperados : 38 | |
9. | | FIERRO, S.; OLIVERA-MUZANTEA, J.; GIL, J.; VIÑOLES, C. Effects of prostaglandin administration on ovarian follicular dynamics, conception, prolificacy, and fecundity in sheep. Theriogenology, 2011, v.76, no.4, p.630-639. Article history: Received 23 August 2010 / Received in revised form 17 March 201 / Accepted 18 March 2011.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
14. | | VIÑOLES, C.; DE BARBIERI, I.; GIL, J.; OLIVERA, J.; FIERRO, S.; BIALADE, F.; MONTOSSI, F. Long-term effect of nutrition on the metabolic status and reproductive potential of Merino rams under grazing conditions. Animal Production Science, 2012, v. 52, no.10, p. 881-889. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11365 History article: Received 2 November 2011; accepted 17 March 2012; published online 16 July 2012.Corresponding author. Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank the staff of INIA’s Research Station and the studentsin thesis from the...Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
15. | | OLIVERA, J.; GIL, J.; FIERRO, S.; DURÁN, G.; ALABART, J.L. Pérdidas embrionarias entre el no retorno al servicio y la fertilidad a ecografía en ovinos bajo diferentes tecnologías de IA. ln: INIA Tacuarembó. Estación Experimental Glencoe. Proyecto Merino Fino del Uruguay: octava distribución de carneros generados en el núcleo fundacional de Merino fino de la Unidad Experimental Glencoe, 1999-2007, Paysandú, 13 de diciembre, 2006. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2007. p. 54-59 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 523)Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
16. | | MINTEGUIAGA, M.A.; BANCHERO, G.; FIERRO, S.; ADRIEN, M.L.; OLIVERA-MUZANTE, J. Impact of focus feeding on reproductive losses, prolificacy, or fecundity of estrous synchronized ewes. Livestock Science, 2022, Volume 256, Article number 104817. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104817 Article history:Received 4 June 2021/ Revised 24 December 2021/ Accepted 27 December 2021/ Available online 30 December 2021.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
17. | | GIL, J.; OLIVERA, J.; FIERRO, S.; DURÁN, G.; GAMARRA, J.; TEIXEIRA, V.; ARAÚJO, A.; STOLETNIY, G. Inseminación intrauterina con semen congelado en majadas Merino Fino: comparación de protocolos de sincronización estral. In: INIA Tacuarembó. Unidad Experimental Glencoe. Avances obtenidos en el Proyecto Merino Fino del Uruguay: núcleo fundacional Unidad Experimental Glencoe, 1999-2006. Paysandú, 19 diciembre, 2006. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2006. p. 16-20 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 475)Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
18. | | VIÑOLES, C.; OLIVERA, J.; GIL, J.; FIERRO, S.; DE BARBIERI, I.; MONTOSSI, F. Manejo nutricional preservicio de carneros Merino. ln: INIA Tacuarembó. Unidad Experimental Glencoe. Proyecto Merino Fino del Uruguay: sexta distribución de carneros generados en el núcleo fundacional de merino fino de la Unidad Experimental Glencoe, INIA Tacuarembó, 1999 - 2005. 16 diciembre, Glencoe, Paysandú, 2005. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2005. p. 10-14 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 439)Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
19. | | GIL, J.; OLIVERA, J.; TEIXEIRA, V.; GAMARRA, J.; ARAUJO, A.; FIERRO, S. Preservación seminal para la IA cervical en majadas del Proyecto Merino Fino: semen congelado. ln: INIA Tacuarembó. Unidad Experimental Glencoe. Proyecto Merino Fino del Uruguay: sexta distribución de carneros generados en el núcleo fundacional de merino fino de la Unidad Experimental Glencoe, INIA Tacuarembó, 1999 - 2005. 16 diciembre, Glencoe, Paysandú, 2005. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2005. p. 21-26 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 439)Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
20. | | OLIVERA, J.; GIL, J.; ARAUJO, A.; GAMARRA, J.; TEIXEIRA, V.; FIERRO, S. Preservación seminal para la IA cervical en majadas del Proyecto Merino Fino: semen refrigerado (24 y 48 horas). ln: INIA Tacuarembó. Unidad Experimental Glencoe. Proyecto Merino Fino del Uruguay: sexta distribución de carneros generados en el núcleo fundacional de merino fino de la Unidad Experimental Glencoe, INIA Tacuarembó, 1999 - 2005. 16 diciembre, Glencoe, Paysandú, 2005. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2005. p. 15-20 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 439)Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 38 | |
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha actual : |
24/04/2018 |
Actualizado : |
04/11/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
ERRANDONEA, N.; FIERRO, S.; VIÑOLES, C.; GIL, J.; BANCHERO, G.; OLIVERA-MUZANTE, J. |
Afiliación : |
N. ERRANDONEA, a Laboratorio de Reproduccion Animal ?Dr. Alfredo Ferraris?, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay.; S. FIERRO, b Secretariado Uruguayo de la Lana (S.U.L.), Area de Transferencia de Tecnología, Montevideo, Uruguay.; CAROLINA VIÑOLES, Polo Agroforestal, EEBR, Universidad de la República, Cerro Largo, Uruguay.; J. GIL, d Laboratorio de Reproduccion Animal “Dr. Alfredo Ferraris”, Polo Produccion Reproducci on de Rumiantes, Facultad de Veterinaria, EEMAC, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay.; GEORGGET ELIZABETH BANCHERO HUNZIKER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; J. OLIVERA-MUZANTE, Laboratorio de Reproduccion Animal “Dr. Alfredo Ferraris”, Departamento de Ovinos, Lanas y Caprinos, Facultad de Veterinaria, EEMAC, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay. |
Título : |
Short term protein supplementation during a long interval prostaglandin-based protocol for timed AI in sheep. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Theriogenology, v. 117, p. 34?39, 2018. |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.03.021 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Article history:Received 14 November 2017//Received in revised form 23 February 2018//Accepted 14 March 2018//
Available online 21 March 2018. |
Contenido : |
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproductive impact of a short-term protein supplementation on a long interval prostaglandin-based protocol (two PG injections 15 d apart; PG15) for timed artificial insemination in sheep. During the breeding season, 437 multiparous Merino ewes grazing native pastures (forage allowance of 6 kg of dry matter/100 kg of live weight; crude protein: 10.8%, metabolic energy: 2.1 Mcal/kg of dry matter) were selected. Ewes were allocated, according to body condition score (3.2 ± 0.2) and body weight (40.6 ± 4.9 kg, mean ± SD), to a 2 × 2 factorial design: type of estrus ?spontaneous estrus (SE) or induced with PG15 (PG15)?, and supplementation (yes or no) before insemination (+FF; soybean meal at Days ?10 to ?3; crude protein: 51.9%, metabolic energy: 2.8 Mcal/kg of dry matter; average consumption 0.9% live weight/ewe/day of dry matter). All ewes were cervically artificial inseminated (Day ?2 to ?3 in SE ewes at estrus detection; Day 0 = timed artificial insemination in PG15 ewes). Ovulation rate on Day 7, non-return to service on Day 23, conception, fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 60 were evaluated. Ovulation rate (1.17 ± 0.40 vs. 1.06 ± 0.25), non-return to service at Day 23 (81.7 vs. 64.2%), conception (78.8 vs. 61.5%), fertility (75.2 vs. 61.5%) and fecundity (0.77 vs. 0.62) were higher in ewes from SE than PG15 group (P < 0.05). However, no differences were observed in prolificacy (1.02 ± 0.16 vs. 1.01 ± 0,12) between groups (P > 0.05). Protein supplementation increased ovulation rate (1.30 ± 0.45 vs. 1.17 ± 0.40), prolificacy (1.18 ± 0.39 vs. 1.02 ± 0.16) and fecundity (0.94 vs. 0.77%; P < 0.05), but not non-return to service on Day 23 (83.8 vs. 81.7%), conception (82.9 vs. 78.8%) or fertility (79.1 vs. 75.2%; P > 0.05) in SE group. The supplement feed to PG15 ewes increased ovulation rate (1.35 ± 0.45 vs. 1.06 ± 0.25), prolificacy (1.25 ± 0.43 vs. 1.01 ± 0.12) and fecundity (0.79 vs. 0.62%; P < 0.05) to levels comparable to SE + FF ewes (P > 0.05). The magnitude of the increase in ovulation rate in PG15 was greater than in the SE group (27 vs. 11%; P < 0.05). However, non-return to service on Day 23 (65.1 vs. 64.2%), conception (63.3 vs 61.5%), and fertility rate (63.3 vs. 61.5%; P < 0.05) remained similar in PG15 supplemented or not supplemented ewes. In conclusion, a short-term protein supplementation before cervical time artificial insemination improved the reproductive performance of ewes synchronized with the PG15 protocol to levels comparable to the SE group MenosAbstract:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproductive impact of a short-term protein supplementation on a long interval prostaglandin-based protocol (two PG injections 15 d apart; PG15) for timed artificial insemination in sheep. During the breeding season, 437 multiparous Merino ewes grazing native pastures (forage allowance of 6 kg of dry matter/100 kg of live weight; crude protein: 10.8%, metabolic energy: 2.1 Mcal/kg of dry matter) were selected. Ewes were allocated, according to body condition score (3.2 ± 0.2) and body weight (40.6 ± 4.9 kg, mean ± SD), to a 2 × 2 factorial design: type of estrus ?spontaneous estrus (SE) or induced with PG15 (PG15)?, and supplementation (yes or no) before insemination (+FF; soybean meal at Days ?10 to ?3; crude protein: 51.9%, metabolic energy: 2.8 Mcal/kg of dry matter; average consumption 0.9% live weight/ewe/day of dry matter). All ewes were cervically artificial inseminated (Day ?2 to ?3 in SE ewes at estrus detection; Day 0 = timed artificial insemination in PG15 ewes). Ovulation rate on Day 7, non-return to service on Day 23, conception, fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 60 were evaluated. Ovulation rate (1.17 ± 0.40 vs. 1.06 ± 0.25), non-return to service at Day 23 (81.7 vs. 64.2%), conception (78.8 vs. 61.5%), fertility (75.2 vs. 61.5%) and fecundity (0.77 vs. 0.62) were higher in ewes from SE than PG15 group (P < 0.05). However, no differences were observed in prolificacy (1.02 ± 0.16 vs. 1.01 ± 0,12) betw... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
EWE; FERTILITY; FOCUS FEEDING; PROSTAGLANDIN; TIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION. |
Thesagro : |
FERTILIDAD; INSEMINACIÓN ARTIFICIAL; OVEJAS; PROSTAGLANDINAS. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
Marc : |
LEADER 03637naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1058472 005 2019-11-04 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.03.021$2DOI 100 1 $aERRANDONEA, N. 245 $aShort term protein supplementation during a long interval prostaglandin-based protocol for timed AI in sheep.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 500 $aArticle history: Article history:Received 14 November 2017//Received in revised form 23 February 2018//Accepted 14 March 2018// Available online 21 March 2018. 520 $aAbstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproductive impact of a short-term protein supplementation on a long interval prostaglandin-based protocol (two PG injections 15 d apart; PG15) for timed artificial insemination in sheep. During the breeding season, 437 multiparous Merino ewes grazing native pastures (forage allowance of 6 kg of dry matter/100 kg of live weight; crude protein: 10.8%, metabolic energy: 2.1 Mcal/kg of dry matter) were selected. Ewes were allocated, according to body condition score (3.2 ± 0.2) and body weight (40.6 ± 4.9 kg, mean ± SD), to a 2 × 2 factorial design: type of estrus ?spontaneous estrus (SE) or induced with PG15 (PG15)?, and supplementation (yes or no) before insemination (+FF; soybean meal at Days ?10 to ?3; crude protein: 51.9%, metabolic energy: 2.8 Mcal/kg of dry matter; average consumption 0.9% live weight/ewe/day of dry matter). All ewes were cervically artificial inseminated (Day ?2 to ?3 in SE ewes at estrus detection; Day 0 = timed artificial insemination in PG15 ewes). Ovulation rate on Day 7, non-return to service on Day 23, conception, fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 60 were evaluated. Ovulation rate (1.17 ± 0.40 vs. 1.06 ± 0.25), non-return to service at Day 23 (81.7 vs. 64.2%), conception (78.8 vs. 61.5%), fertility (75.2 vs. 61.5%) and fecundity (0.77 vs. 0.62) were higher in ewes from SE than PG15 group (P < 0.05). However, no differences were observed in prolificacy (1.02 ± 0.16 vs. 1.01 ± 0,12) between groups (P > 0.05). Protein supplementation increased ovulation rate (1.30 ± 0.45 vs. 1.17 ± 0.40), prolificacy (1.18 ± 0.39 vs. 1.02 ± 0.16) and fecundity (0.94 vs. 0.77%; P < 0.05), but not non-return to service on Day 23 (83.8 vs. 81.7%), conception (82.9 vs. 78.8%) or fertility (79.1 vs. 75.2%; P > 0.05) in SE group. The supplement feed to PG15 ewes increased ovulation rate (1.35 ± 0.45 vs. 1.06 ± 0.25), prolificacy (1.25 ± 0.43 vs. 1.01 ± 0.12) and fecundity (0.79 vs. 0.62%; P < 0.05) to levels comparable to SE + FF ewes (P > 0.05). The magnitude of the increase in ovulation rate in PG15 was greater than in the SE group (27 vs. 11%; P < 0.05). However, non-return to service on Day 23 (65.1 vs. 64.2%), conception (63.3 vs 61.5%), and fertility rate (63.3 vs. 61.5%; P < 0.05) remained similar in PG15 supplemented or not supplemented ewes. In conclusion, a short-term protein supplementation before cervical time artificial insemination improved the reproductive performance of ewes synchronized with the PG15 protocol to levels comparable to the SE group 650 $aFERTILIDAD 650 $aINSEMINACIÓN ARTIFICIAL 650 $aOVEJAS 650 $aPROSTAGLANDINAS 653 $aEWE 653 $aFERTILITY 653 $aFOCUS FEEDING 653 $aPROSTAGLANDIN 653 $aTIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION 700 1 $aFIERRO, S. 700 1 $aVIÑOLES, C. 700 1 $aGIL, J. 700 1 $aBANCHERO, G. 700 1 $aOLIVERA-MUZANTE, J. 773 $tTheriogenology$gv. 117, p. 34?39, 2018.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|